Aarushi Talwar was a 14-year old student at the delhi public school. She was the daughter of a dentist couple, Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nupur Talwar. The family lived in an apartment, Jalvayu Vihar of Noida, Uttar Pradesh.
AARUSHI TALWAR
HEMRAJ
The Noida double murder case refers to the murder of 14-year old Aarushi Talwar and 45-year old Hemraj Banjade. Aarushi is a student at Delhi Public School while Hemraj was a domestic help and cook employed by her family. The two (Aarushi and Hemraj), were killed on the night of 15 May 2008 at Aarushi's home. The case awaken the public interest as a tragedic story. Media from India and also foreign 0had a heavy coverage of the story.
RAJESH TALWARAND NUPUR TALWAR
Aarushi's dead body was discovered on 16 May and her parents informed the same in the police station, the same day. The missing servant Hemraj was considered as the main suspect in the starting. However, the next day, his dead body was discovered on the terrace. The police were heavily criticized for carrying the investigation very carelessly by failing to secure the crime scene and not following important leads immediately.
At first, the Talwars' former servant, Vishnu Sharma was considered as a suspect, as he had lost his job to Hemraj. The police were in dilemma that Aarushi's father Rajesh might have murdered the two after knowing about the sexual relationship between them, or that Rajesh had hit Aarushi fatally after she confronted him about his alleged extra-marital affair with Hemraj and Hemraj was killed as he was a witness to Aarushi's death. An alternative theory stated that Hemraj was the main target of the killing as he was blackmailing Rajesh, while Aarushi was killed for being a witness. The accusations enraged the friends and family members of the Talwars, who alleged that the police was trying to frame the parents in a bid to cover up its own incompetence and botched-up investigation. On 31 May, the case was transferred from the Uttar Pradesh Police to the Central bureau of Investigation (CBI). Rajesh was released in June 2008, after the investigators could not find any solid evidence against him.
By this time, the CBI's suspicion had moved to Hemraj's Nepali acquaintances:
(1)Krishna - an assistant at the Talwars' clinic,
(2) Rajkumar and (3) Vijay (domestic servants).
Krishna, who worked as an assistant at the Talwars' clinic, held a grudge against Rajesh, who had reprimanded him for an occupational mistake. According to the CBI, the three men were let in the house by Hemraj. The investigators suspected that the three men tried to sexually assault Aarushi and killed her when she resisted; Hemraj was killed as he was the only witness to their entry in the house. The CBI claimed that the three men had confessed to the crime in Narco test after being injected with Sodium Pentothal. However, these three accused are not really the main murderers but drilled with the false information prior to the test and their Lawyer met NHRC with video recordings of the tests that allegedly showed the CBI "putting words in their mouths" and torturing them to confess the crimes. He mentioned that police men are trying to turn the case accusing the poor nepalis to save upper class talwars. Ultimately, all the suspects were released as they have no solid evidence to prove those nepali’s as real suspects and Even their fingerprints were not found at the crime scene.
There after the case was hand overed to the new CBI team eho claimed that Rajesh Talwar is the only possible suspect, but stated that there was not enough evidence to charge him. The realtives and family friends opposed the sentence of CBI second team as no evidence was still in their pockets. But the court noted that there was enough evidence to charge the parents, and ordered proceedings against them. On 25 November 2013, a CBI court convicted the couple for the murders. The Talwars called the verdict as a miscarriage of justice, and plan to appeal to a higher court.
Of course there is no direct evidence but CBI has placed a 'clinching wealth of circumstances' from which the guilt of Rajesh Talwar and his wife Nupur has been made out for murdering their daughter Aarushi and domestic help Hemraj, judge Shyam Lal said while outlining 26 reasons for sentencing the couple to rigorous life imprisonment. "From the evidence as tendered by the prosecution in form of oral and documentary evidence this court reaches to the irresistible and impeccable conclusion that only the accused persons are responsible for committing this ghastly crime as the following circumstances unerringly point towards the hypothesis of guilt of the accused," the 210-page order said while pointing out 26 circumstances leading to the conviction.
1. That irrefragably on the fateful night of May 15 and 16, 2008 both the accused were last seen with both the deceased in Flat No. L-32, Jalvayu Vihar at about 9.30 P.M. by Umesh Sharma, the driver of Rajesh Talwar;
2. That on the morning of May 16, 2008 at about 6.00 A.M. Aarushi was found murdered in her bed-room which was adjacent to the bedroom of the accused and there was only partition wall between two bed-rooms;
3. That the dead body of the servant Hemraj was found lying in the pool of blood on the terrace of flat no. L-32, Jalvayu Vihar on May 17, 2008 and the door of terrace was found locked from inside;
4. That there is a close proximity between the point of time when both the accused and the deceased persons were last seen together alive and the deceased were murdered in the intervening night of May 15 and 16, 2008 and as such the time is so small that possibility of any other person(s) other than the accused being the authors of the crime becomes impossible;
5. That the door of Aarushi's bed-room was fitted with automatic click-shut lock. Mahesh Kumar Mishra, the then S.P. (City), NOIDA has deposed that when he talked to Rajesh Talwar on May 16, 2008 in the morning, he had told him that in the preceding night at about 11.30 P.M. he had gone to sleep with the key after locking the door of Aarushi's bed-room from outside. Both the accused have admitted that door of Aarushi's bed-room was having automatic-clickshut lock like that of a hotel, which could not be opened from outside without key but could be opened from inside without key. No explanation has been offered by the accused as to how the lock of Aarushi’s room was opened and by whom.
6. That the internet remained active in the night of the gory incident suggesting that at least one of the accused remained awake;
7. That there is nothing to show that an outsider(s) came inside the house in the said night after 9.30 P.M.;
8. That there was no disruption in the supply of electricity in that night;
9. That no person was seen loitering near the flats in suspicious circumstances during that night;
10. That there is no evidence of forcible entry of any outsider(s) in the flat in the night of occurrence;
11. That there is no evidence of any larcenous act in the flat;
12. That in the morning of May 16, 2008 when the maid came to the flat for the purpose of cleaning and mopping, a false pretext was made by Nupur Talwar that door might have been locked from outside by the servant Hemraj although it was not locked or latched from outside;
13. That the house maid Bharti Mandal has nowhere stated that when she came inside the flat both the accused were found weeping;
14. That from the testimony of Bharti Mandal it is manifestly clear that when she reached the flat and talked to Nupur Talwar then at that time she had not complained about the murder of her daughter and rather she told the maid deliberately that Hemraj might have gone to fetch milk from Mother dairy after locking the wooden door from outside. This lack of spontaneity is relevant under section 8 of the Evidence Act;
15. That the clothes of both the accused were not found soaked with blood. It is highly unnatural that parents of deceased Aarushi will not cling to and hug her on seeing her murdered;
16. That no outsider(s) will dare to take Hemraj to the terrace in severely injured condition and thereafter search out a lock to be placed in the door of the terrace;
17. That it is not possible that an outsider(s) after committing the murders will muster courage to take Scotch whisky knowing that the parents of the deceased Aarushi are in the nearby room and his top priority will be to run away from the crime scene immediately.
18. That no outsider(s) will bother to take the body of Hemraj to the terrace. Moreover, a single person cannot take the body to the terrace;
19. That the door of the terrace was never locked prior to the occurrence but it was found locked in the morning of May 16, 2008 and the accused did not give the key of the lock to the police despite being asked to give the same;
20. That the accused have taken plea in the statements under section 313 Cr.P.C. that about 8-10 days before the occurrence painting of cluster had started and the navvies used to take water from water tank placed on the terrace of the flat and then Hemraj had started locking the door of the terrace and the key of that lock remained with him. If it was so then it was not easily possible for an outsider to find out the key of the lock of terrace door;
21. That if an outsider(s) may have committed the crime in question after locking the door of terrace and had gone out of the flat then the outer most mesh door or middle mesh door must have been found latched from outside;
22. That the motive of commission of the crime has been established;
23. That it is not possible that after commission of the crime an outsider(s) will dress-up the crime scene;
24. That golf-club no.5 was thrown in the loft after commission of the crime and the same was produced after many months by the accused Rajesh Talwar;
25. That pattern of head and neck injuries of both the accused persons are almost similar in nature and can be caused by golf-club and scalpel respectively;
26. That the accused Rajesh Talwar was a member of the Golf-Club NOIDA and golf-clubs were produced by him before the CBI and scalpel is used by the dentists and both the accused are dentists by profession. "The manner in which the murders were committed is not the handiwork of single accused and rather the murders were committed and evidence destroyed by both the accused in furtherance of their common intention which is apparent from the facts and circumstances" mentioned, the judge said.
Finally, Arushi’s parents convicted to be the real suspects impeccably and sentencing them to the lifetime imprisonment.
No comments:
Post a Comment