WHAT REALLY TARUN TEJPAL DID TO HER IS RAPE??

Tehelka rape case victim, the young reporter who has accused Tehelka founder Tarun Tejpal for sexually harassing her on hotel elevator  in Goa earlier this month. Today she proved the allegations that the case towards him is politically motivated.

Tarun Tejpal arrested in the sexual assault case today on landing in Goa Dabolim airport. Policemen took Tarun Tejpal directly to the court and attended him.

Tarun Tejpal's lawyer utters victim's name in court, judge reacts strongly, says, "It's not done, looks like she is in the dock and she is accused." Tejpal's lawyer apologises to court after naming the complainant.

Tarun tejpal granted a interim bail till 10 a.m tomorrow (30th november).

victim urged political parties to stop politicizing her issue.

The journalist, who accused Tarun Tejpal of sexually assaulting her in a hotel elevator, today said that what the Tehelka founder did to her was rape and she was only fighting for her integrity.

She also thanked people for supporting her but was disturbed by allegations that the entire failure was a secret plan of politicians to do something unlawfull in her case.

"I call upon our political parties to resist the temptation to turn a very important discussion about gender, power and violence into a conversation about themselves," she said in a statement.

The statement given by her is below:

“I am heartened by the broad support I have received over the past fortnight. However, I am deeply concerned and very disturbed by insinuations that my complaint is part of a pre-election political conspiracy.

I categorically refute such insinuations and put forward the following arguments:

The struggle for women to assert control over their lives and their bodies is most certainly a political one, but feminist politics and its concerns are wider than the narrow universe of our political parties. Thus, I call upon our political parties to resist the temptation to turn a very important discussion about gender, power and violence into a conversation about themselves.

Suggestions that I am acting on someone else's behest are only the latest depressing indications that sections of our public discourse are unwilling to acknowledge that women are capable to making decisions about themselves for themselves.

In this past week, television commentators who should know better, have questioned my motivations and my actions during and after Mr. Tejpal molested me. Some have questioned the time it took for me to file my complaint, more inquisitive commentators have questioned the use of the word "sexual molestation" versus words like "rape."

Perhaps the hardest part of this unrelentingly painful experience has been my struggle with taxonomy. I don't know if I am ready to see myself as a "rape victim", for my colleagues, friends, supporters and critics to see me thus. It is not the victim that categorizes crimes: it is the law. And in this case, the law is clear: what Mr. Tejpal did to me falls within the legal definition of rape.

Now that we have a new law that broadens the definition of rape, we should stand by what we fought for. We have spoken, time and again, about how rape is not about lust or sex, but about power, privilege and entitlement. Thus this new law should be applicable to everybody - the wealthy, the powerful, and the well connected - and not just to faceless strangers.

As seen by some of the responses to this case, instances of familial and custodial rape present doughty challenges to even the most adamantine feminists.

Unlike Mr. Tejpal, I am not a person of immense means. I have been raised singlehandedly by my mother's single income. My father's health has been very fragile for many years now. 

Unlike Mr. Tejpal, who is fighting to protect his wealth, his influence and his privilege, I am fighting to preserve nothing except for my integrity and my right to assert that my body is my own and not the plaything of my employer. By filing my complaint, I have lost not just a job that I loved, but much-needed financial security and the independence of my salary. I have also opened myself to personal and slanderous attack. This will not be an easy battle.

In my life, and my writings, I have always urged women to speak out and break the collusive silence that surrounds sexual crime. This crisis has only confirmed the myriad difficulties faced by survivors. First, our utterances are questioned, then our motivations, and finally our strength is turned against us:  a politician will issue a statement claiming that speaking out against sexual violence will hurt our professional prospects; an application filed in the Delhi High Court will question why the victim remained "normal".

Had I chosen silence in this instance, I would not have been able to face either myself or the feminist movement that is forged and renewed afresh by generations of strong women.

Finally, an array of men of privilege have expressed sorrow that Tehelka, the institution, has suffered in this crisis. I remind them that this crisis was caused by the abusive violence of the magazine's Editor-in-Chief, and not by an employee who chose to speak out”.

She thanked everyone for supporting her wishing for her integrity as well.

“MOTHER'S LITTLE HEADFULL” -- THE AWARD WINNING PHOTOGRAPHY

Udayan Rao Pawar, a 14 year old Indian boy, who explored out overnight on the banks of river in Madhya Pradesh, to get a shot of the reptiles and crocodiles early in the morning, has won the precious title of "Young Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2013". The contest is co-owned by London's Natural History Museum and BBC Worldwide. Indian photographer Udayan Rao Pawar and South African Lensman Greg Du Toit have been named winners of this year's   “ Wild Life Photographers Of The Year”.

Greg du Toit 

Udayan Rao Pawar was awarded by the U.K. based Natural History Museum and BBC Worldwide for his wild life photography, titled “Mother’s little headfull,” which shows a mother crocodile with her young piled on top of her head in the Chambal river, a tributary of the Yamuna river which runs through central India in the state Madhya Pradesh.

Udayan's photography- mother's little headfull

Udayan slept near a nesting colony of the endangered area with the large fish eating crocodiles with a narrow snout to capture his shot early in the morning, according to a statement on the museum’s website.

He informed that the area is under threat from illegal sand mining and fishing. 

The young photographer describes the situation of his photography named “Mother’s little headfull” as the mother rose to the surface from the murky depths of the river in response to the guttural calls of the hatchlings, which then rushed towards her and climbed on her head.”

“It turned out that the mother crocodiles was the chief female of the group and looking after all the young animals that has recently emerged from its egg”, the museum said in a statement.

The young wild life photographer Udayan used the camera Canon EOS 550D and used 100-400mm lenses for his photography which made him to win Wildlife Photographer of the Year.

They are one of the largest crocodilians about seven meters in length with the thinnest and most elongated snout which elongates at the nostrils.

 The gharial is the most aquatic of the crocodile family and never moves far from the water, according to the World Wild Life. They feed on fish and other warm-blooded species which they catch between interlocking teeth. UK based museum which conducted the competition included the statement that overhunting and destruction of the habitat through dam building has reduced their range significantly.

Gharials have become extinct as they were hunted for their valuable skins. Even their eggs are stolen for food and young gharials today often get trapped in fishermen’s nets, according to the WWF.

Judge Tui De Roy, a naturalist and wildlife photographer, said the composition and timing of Udayan’s photograph was perfect. “The mother’s gaze seems directed at you, appealing to you to let her live and thrive in peace,” he said. “This image is beautiful and thought-irritating, but at the same time wonderfully playful.”

This year's Wildlife Photographer of the Year is South African artist Gred du Toit, who won over the judges with his photograph of an African elephant from Botswana.

He told BBC News that he had been photographing elephants for a decade in search of the perfect shot and chose elephants because he feels a very special energy and connection when he is around them."

Wild-life photography of the year

The contest for young wildlife photographer is open to candidates aged 17 and under and winners are awarded in three age categories, 10 years and under, 11-14 years and 15 to 17 years. The overall winner from all age groups wins £1,000 (about US$1,614), a trophy and a master class with a leading nature photographer.The 2013 winner beat 43,000 entries submitted from 96 countries. 

THE TALWARS - ARE THEY "THE REAL CONVICTS !!!???"

Aarushi Talwar was a 14-year old student at the delhi public school. She was the daughter of a dentist couple, Dr. Rajesh Talwar and Dr. Nupur Talwar. The family lived in an apartment, Jalvayu Vihar of Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

AARUSHI TALWAR

HEMRAJ

The Noida double murder case refers to the murder of 14-year old Aarushi Talwar and 45-year old Hemraj Banjade. Aarushi is a student at Delhi Public School while Hemraj was a domestic help and cook  employed by her family. The two (Aarushi and Hemraj), were killed on the night of 15 May 2008 at Aarushi's home. The case awaken the public interest as a tragedic story. Media from India and also foreign 0had a heavy coverage of the story.

RAJESH TALWARAND NUPUR TALWAR

Aarushi's dead body was discovered on 16 May and her parents informed the same in the police station, the same day. The missing servant Hemraj was considered as the main suspect in the starting. However, the next day, his dead body was discovered on the terrace. The police were heavily criticized for carrying the investigation very carelessly by failing to secure the crime scene and not following important leads immediately.

At first, the Talwars' former servant, Vishnu Sharma was considered as a suspect, as he had lost his job to Hemraj. The police were in dilemma that Aarushi's father Rajesh might have murdered the two after knowing about the sexual relationship between them, or that Rajesh had hit Aarushi fatally after she confronted him about his alleged extra-marital affair with Hemraj and Hemraj was killed as he was a witness to Aarushi's death. An alternative theory stated that Hemraj was the main target of the killing as he was blackmailing Rajesh, while Aarushi was killed for being a witness. The accusations enraged the friends and family members of the Talwars, who alleged that the police was trying to frame the parents in a bid to cover up its own incompetence and botched-up investigation. On 31 May, the case was transferred from the Uttar Pradesh Police to the Central bureau of Investigation (CBI). Rajesh was released in June 2008, after the investigators could not find any solid evidence against him.

By this time, the CBI's suspicion had moved to Hemraj's Nepali acquaintances:

(1)Krishna - an assistant at the Talwars' clinic,

(2) Rajkumar and (3) Vijay (domestic servants).

Krishna, who worked as an assistant at the Talwars' clinic, held a grudge against Rajesh, who had reprimanded him for an occupational mistake. According to the CBI, the three men were let in the house by Hemraj. The investigators suspected that the three men tried to sexually assault Aarushi and killed her when she resisted; Hemraj was killed as he was the only witness to their entry in the house. The CBI claimed that the three men had confessed to the crime in Narco test  after being injected with Sodium Pentothal. However, these three accused are not really the main murderers but drilled with the false information prior to the test and their Lawyer met NHRC with video recordings of the tests that allegedly showed the CBI "putting words in their mouths" and torturing them to confess the crimes. He mentioned that police men are trying to turn the case accusing the poor nepalis to save upper class talwars. Ultimately, all the suspects were released as they have no solid  evidence to prove those nepali’s as real suspects and Even their fingerprints were not found at the crime scene.

There after the case was hand overed to the new CBI team eho claimed that Rajesh Talwar is the only possible suspect, but stated that there was not enough evidence to charge him. The realtives and family friends opposed the sentence of CBI second team as no evidence was still in their pockets. But the court noted that there was enough evidence to charge the parents, and ordered proceedings against them. On 25 November 2013, a CBI court convicted the couple for the murders. The Talwars called the verdict as a miscarriage of justice, and plan to appeal to a higher court.

Of course there is no direct evidence but CBI has placed a 'clinching wealth of circumstances' from which the guilt of Rajesh Talwar and his wife Nupur has been made out for murdering their daughter Aarushi and domestic help Hemraj, judge Shyam Lal said while outlining 26 reasons for sentencing the couple to rigorous life imprisonment. "From the evidence as tendered by the prosecution in form of oral and documentary evidence this court reaches to the irresistible and impeccable conclusion that only the accused persons are responsible for committing this ghastly crime as the following circumstances unerringly point towards the hypothesis of guilt of the accused," the 210-page order said while pointing out 26 circumstances leading to the conviction.

1. That irrefragably on the fateful night of May 15 and 16, 2008 both the accused were last seen with both the deceased in Flat No. L-32, Jalvayu Vihar at about 9.30 P.M. by Umesh Sharma, the driver of Rajesh Talwar;

2. That on the morning of May 16, 2008 at about 6.00 A.M. Aarushi was found murdered in her bed-room which was adjacent to the bedroom of the accused and there was only partition wall between two bed-rooms;

3. That the dead body of the servant Hemraj was found lying in the pool of blood on the terrace of flat no. L-32, Jalvayu Vihar on May 17, 2008 and the door of terrace was found locked from inside;

4. That there is a close proximity between the point of time when both the accused and the deceased persons were last seen together alive and the deceased were murdered in the intervening night of May 15 and 16, 2008 and as such the time is so small that possibility of any other person(s) other than the accused being the authors of the crime becomes impossible;

5. That the door of Aarushi's bed-room was fitted with automatic click-shut lock. Mahesh Kumar Mishra, the then S.P. (City), NOIDA has deposed that when he talked to Rajesh Talwar on May 16, 2008 in the morning, he had told him that in the preceding night at about 11.30 P.M. he had gone to sleep with the key after locking the door of Aarushi's bed-room from outside. Both the accused have admitted that door of Aarushi's bed-room was having automatic-clickshut lock like that of a hotel, which could not be opened from outside without key but could be opened from inside without key. No explanation has been offered by the accused as to how the lock of Aarushi’s room was opened and by whom.

6. That the internet remained active in the night of the gory incident suggesting that at least one of the accused remained awake;

7. That there is nothing to show that an outsider(s) came inside the house in the said night after 9.30 P.M.;

8. That there was no disruption in the supply of electricity in that night;

9. That no person was seen loitering near the flats in suspicious circumstances during that night;

10. That there is no evidence of forcible entry of any outsider(s) in the flat in the night of occurrence;

11. That there is no evidence of any larcenous act in the flat;

12. That in the morning of May 16, 2008 when the maid came to the flat for the purpose of cleaning and mopping, a false pretext was made by Nupur Talwar that door might have been locked from outside by the servant Hemraj although it was not locked or latched from outside;

13. That the house maid Bharti Mandal has nowhere stated that when she came inside the flat both the accused were found weeping;

14. That from the testimony of Bharti Mandal it is manifestly clear that when she reached the flat and talked to Nupur Talwar then at that time she had not complained about the murder of her daughter and rather she told the maid deliberately that Hemraj might have gone to fetch milk from Mother dairy after locking the wooden door from outside. This lack of spontaneity is relevant under section 8 of the Evidence Act;

15. That the clothes of both the accused were not found soaked with blood. It is highly unnatural that parents of deceased Aarushi will not cling to and hug her on seeing her murdered;

16. That no outsider(s) will dare to take Hemraj to the terrace in severely injured condition and thereafter search out a lock to be placed in the door of the terrace;

17. That it is not possible that an outsider(s) after committing the murders will muster courage to take Scotch whisky knowing that the parents of the deceased Aarushi are in the nearby room and his top priority will be to run away from the crime scene immediately.

18. That no outsider(s) will bother to take the body of Hemraj to the terrace. Moreover, a single person cannot take the body to the terrace;

19. That the door of the terrace was never locked prior to the occurrence but it was found locked in the morning of May 16, 2008 and the accused did not give the key of the lock to the police despite being asked to give the same;

20. That the accused have taken plea in the statements under section 313 Cr.P.C. that about 8-10 days before the occurrence painting of cluster had started and the navvies used to take water from water tank placed on the terrace of the flat and then Hemraj had started locking the door of the terrace and the key of that lock remained with him. If it was so then it was not easily possible for an outsider to find out the key of the lock of terrace door;

21. That if an outsider(s) may have committed the crime in question after locking the door of terrace and had gone out of the flat then the outer most mesh door or middle mesh door must have been found latched from outside;

22. That the motive of commission of the crime has been established;

23. That it is not possible that after commission of the crime an outsider(s) will dress-up the crime scene;

24. That golf-club no.5 was thrown in the loft after commission of the crime and the same was produced after many months by the accused Rajesh Talwar;

25. That pattern of head and neck injuries of both the accused persons are almost similar in nature and can be caused by golf-club and scalpel respectively;

26. That the accused Rajesh Talwar was a member of the Golf-Club NOIDA and golf-clubs were produced by him before the CBI and scalpel is used by the dentists and both the accused are dentists by profession. "The manner in which the murders were committed is not the handiwork of single accused and rather the murders were committed and evidence destroyed by both the accused in furtherance of their common intention which is apparent from the facts and circumstances" mentioned, the judge said.

Finally, Arushi’s parents convicted to be the real suspects impeccably and sentencing them to the lifetime imprisonment. 

SACHIN RAMESH TENDULKAR

NAME: Sachin Ramesh Tendulkar

Father’s name: Ramesh Tendulkar

Mother’s name: Rajni Tendulkar.

D.O.B: 24-4-1973

PLACE OF BIRTH : Bombay, Maharashtra, India.

FAMILY DETAILS:
He belongs to a middle-class family and youngest of four children. His father was a professor while his mother worked for a life insurance company.
He got married on 24th may 1995 to Anjali tendulkar, daughter of Gujarati industrialist Anand Mehta and British social worker Annabel Mehta . 

The above photograph was with his two children, Arjun Tendulkar and Sara Tendulkar and his wife Anjali Tendulkar behind them .

Career :

 He started playing cricket at the age of 11,with the encouragement of his brother ,Ajit Tendulkar when he took him to Achrekar sir(coach). Achrekar was impressed with Tendulkar's talent and advised him to shift his schooling to Sharadashram Vidyamandir High School, a school at Dadar which had a dominant cricket team and had produced many notable cricketers. At the age of 14 ,he scored 329 out of a world record stand of 664 in a school match. As his accomplishments grew, he became a sort of cult figure among Bombay schoolboys.His cricket history started from Mumbai in the Wankhede stadium ground with collaboration of the Mumbai Cricket Association (MCA).With his best contribution,Tendulkar has become the team member at the age of  16 ,India's youngest  cricketer with the interaction of BCCI.

His one and only dream was to play for Indian cricket team. He worked so hard and finally reached a position with  huge name and fame which would remind him for hundreds of years untill cricket fans survive on this earth.

MASTER BLASTER---SACHIN TENDULKAR

SACHIN’S BEST RECORDS:

Ø  In 24 years, Tendulkar has played in 90 different venues which is a record.

Ø  Tendulkar remains the only cricketer to take 154 wickets  and score more than 15,000 runs

Ø  (18,426) in ODI.

Ø  1894, These are most runs scored by a batsman in any season in ODI cricket. Tendulkar scored 9centuries in the year 1998 .

Ø  In the six World Cup appearances, Tendulkar has smashed  2,560 runs at an average of 56.95 – the

Ø  highest  runs by any player in the history of the event.

Ø  Tendulkar has played with and against 989 international cricketers. That includes 141 Indian

Ø  cricketers and 848 opponents

Ø  62 man of the matches in his complete ODI career. No ever awarded this figure.

Ø  15 man of the series in his ODI.

Ø  51 hundreds in test career.

Ø  49 hundreds in ODI.

Ø  200 Test Match Appearances

Ø  463 ODI Appearances

Ø  18,426 ODI Runs

Ø  15,921 Test Runs

  CRICKET DEBUT RECORDS:

v  Highest run getter in test matches (15,921).

v  Highest run getter in ODIs (18,426).

v  15,310 of his runs came while opening the innings with the aid of 45 centuries and 75

v  fifties in 340 innings.

v  Most number of centuries in Test matches – 51.

v  Most number of centuries in ODIs – 49.

v  Most number of man of the match awards (62) in the ODIs.

v  Most number of man of the series awards (17) in ODIs.

v  Best average for man of the matches in ODIs.

v  First cricketer to reach 10,000–11,000–12,000–13,000–14,000–15,000–16,000–17,000–18,000 runs in the ODIs.

v  Only player ever to cross the 14,000–15,000–16,000–17,000 and 18,000 run marks in ODIs.

v  He is the highest run scorer in World Cups (2,278 at an average of 56.95)

v  Most number of the man of the match awards in World cups.

v  Most number of runs in the 1996 World cup – 523 runs at an average of 87.16.

v  Most number of runs in the 2003 World cup – 673 runs in 2003 Cricket World Cup, highest by any player in a single Cricket World Cup.

v  Most number of Fifties in ODIs – 96..

v  Appeared in most number of tests – 200.

v  Appeared in most number of ODIs – 463.

v  First player to score 200 runs in an ODI.

v  Is the only player to have made three scores of 175 or more.

v  Is the only player with five scores of 150 or more.

v  Longest career : 24 years 1 day.

v  He was the first cricketer to receive the Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna

v  He only player ever to cross the 14,000, 15,000, 16,000, 17,000, 18,000 run marks IN ODI.

v  He is in top 10 Batsmen who  scored more than 190 sixes in ODI cricket

v  First man to hit25 fours in single ODI

   AWARS:

      1994: Arjun award Recipient for achievements in cricket

     1997: Tendulkar was one of the five cricketers selected as WISDON

             cricketer of the year
1997/98: India's highest sporting honour – Rajiv Gandhi Khel Ratna
1999: PADMA SHRI– India's fourth highest civilian award
2008: PADMA VIBHUSHAN – India's second highest civilian award

2010: ICC CRICKETER OF THE YEAR – Highest award in the ICC listings

2010:  LG PEOPLE CHOICE AWARD

2010: Tendulkar was one of the five cricketers selected as WISDON

         cricketer of the year

2012: Tendulkar was one of the five cricketers selected as WISDON

          cricketer of the year

2013: BHARATH RATNA- India's highest civilian honour.

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO SEE
SACHIN'S DEBUT 

SACHIN TENDULKAR - PROFESSIONAL DEBUTS

CAREER in ICC BOARD

 At age 16, Tendulkar made his debut in international competition  with a match against Pakistan in Karachi.  At the age of 18 he scored a pair of centuries in Australia, then in 1994 SMASHED up a score of 179 in a match against the West Indies,which was top score at the time. Tendulkar was just 23 when he was named captain of his country's team for the 1996 World Cup.

 While the tournament was a disappointment for his club,Tendulkar did nothing to diminish his own standing as one of the world's dominant players. He finished out the World Cup as the event's top scorer(man of the series).Tendulkar's dominance of his sport has continued, even as he's moved well into his thirties. He scored his record-breaking 35th century in Test play in December 2005 in a match against Sri Lanka. he became the first cricketer to score 35 centuries (100 runs in a single inning) in Test play. In 2007 Tendulkar reached another major milestone, becoming the first player to record 15,000 runs in one-day international play.In June 2007 he set another mark when he became the first player to record 15,000 runs in one-day international play. In January 2010 he again moved into the record books when became the first batsman to score 13,000 runs in Test play.On national newsweekly went so far as to devote an entire issue to the young cricketer, dubbing him "The Last Hero" for his home country.

 His style of play—aggressive and inventive—resonated with the sport's fans, as did Tendulkar's unassuming off the field living. Even with his increasing wealth, Tendulkar showed humility and refused to show off his money.Just one month later he registered another first, a "double century" in a match against South Africa. That same year he was named the 2010 International Cricket Council Cricketer of the Year.In April 2011 Tendulkar chalked up another milestone when he led India to a World Cup victory, his first in his long career. During the tournament, the batsman again showed why he's one of the sport's greatest athletes by becoming the first batsman to score 2,000 runs and six centuries in World Cup play.

FOLLOWTHE BELOW LINK TO SEE
AWARDS OF SACHIN TENDULKAR

Inauguration Of GOLDEN ELEPHANT

Its today……. International children's film festival which is GOLDEN ELEPHANT has started in Hyderabad. Its the 18th anniversary  which will go on till November 20 will mostly showcase Indian films. The festival was inaugurated at the Telugu Lalitha Kala Toranam at Public Gardens hoping that the festival will rise the enthusiasm of every child all around..

Out of 203 films that will be screened, more than 84 films are Indian productions. About 48 country  films  have been considered for the festival. Interpreted goal, the Czech Republic, which is the country 'in focus' for the festival has only 11 films for screening while India has more entries.

Children will be watching films from Japan, Austria, The Netherlands, Cuba, Iran, Ethiopia, Switzerland, Germany, Israel, Poland, Latvia, Brazil, Denmark, Germany, Columbia, France, South Korea, Peru, South Africa, France, Sweden, Afghanistan, Russia, Tunisia, Republic of Belarus, Australia, Germany, Norway, Chile, Spain, Azerbaijan, Switzerland, Denmark, China, Pakistan, Thailand, Poland, Scotland, Latvia, Greenland, Finland, New Zealand, Croatia, Slovenia, China, Poland, Afghanistan, Morocco, Indonesia, UK, Taiwan and Canada. 

The 20-member committee  for the four different sections in the festival has six Indians, including three from Hyderabad, namely, director P Suneel Kumar Reddy, director N Gopala Krishna, and M Veda Kumar of Children's Film Society.

While the delegates for the film festival will watch the screenings at Prasads Imax and  children can watch the films only in selected theatres in the Hyderabad.

The film festival is being organised by Children’s Film festival of India (CFSI).CFSI is the autonomous body under the ministry of information and broadcasting with the collaboration of government of Andhra Pradesh. The ministry has allotted Rs 3.35 crore for the entire festival, while the state government is expected to contribute an equivalent contribution as well.  

Talking about the aim of the festival ,Dr. Shravan Kumar said, "The 18th Golden Elephant which  is a collaborative effort between CFSI and autonomous body of the Minisry of braodcasting and information.Ministry aims to promote the fundamental values of healthy and wholesome entertainment for children by bringing the best films from all diverse cultural backgrounds.

Representing film package of festival around 200 fims, Salman Khan gave his best wishes to the children's film festival and spoke about film experiences in his life.

And at last its has been observed that, even Hyderabad is the permanent venue of the film festival for every 2years, there is no Telugu film in the list of screenings yet.